Skip to content
Topiary

Services

Four disciplines, one operator

We take on the channels where the decisions overlap. Running paid search without seeing the organic picture, or email without the margin data, produces confident advice that happens to be wrong.

Why one operator

Because our founder ran all four of them himself, in his own business, for years before there was any budget to hire someone — the paid search, the SEO, the email programme and the testing on the checkout, at a point where every pound came out of the same account as the wages. The background is on the about page.

Paid search and shopping for retailers with real budget at stake, managed by the person who builds the account.

Most large retail accounts are not underspending. They are spending broadly — thousands of near-duplicate keywords, shopping feeds left on defaults, and automation pointed at the wrong signal. The work is deciding what to cut and what to protect.

What the work involves →

Organic

SEO

Technical, content and commercial SEO for large product catalogues, where template decisions matter more than blog posts.

On a site with forty thousand URLs, SEO is a template and architecture problem before it is a content problem. Fixing how a category page is generated is worth more than a year of articles, and it is the work most agencies quietly avoid because it needs developer time.

What the work involves →

Lifecycle and retention programmes: the flows that run every day, not the campaign that went out last Tuesday.

Retention revenue is usually concentrated in a handful of automated flows that were set up once and never revisited. Meanwhile the campaign calendar absorbs most of the team's week. We tend to find the leverage sits in the opposite place to the effort.

What the work involves →

Research-led experimentation on the journeys that carry your traffic, with results you can defend to a finance director.

The problem with most testing programmes is not the tests, it is the sample. A retailer running a button-colour test on a page with four hundred weekly sessions will spend six months learning nothing. We start by working out where you have enough traffic to learn anything at all.

What the work involves →

Who this suits, and what it costs

Retailers between £5m and £50m of online revenue

Below that, the problems are usually simpler than they look and you would be paying senior rates for work that does not need them. Above it, you likely have the in-house team already and need something more specialised than this. We will say so either way rather than take the engagement.

£5,000 to £10,000 a month

Excluding VAT, and depending on how much work is involved and how many of the four disciplines are in scope. Scope and fee are agreed in writing before anything starts, and neither moves when your media budget does.

Why it is a fee and not a percentage

The standard agency model takes a percentage of what you spend on media. Read that as an incentive rather than a price: the agency’s income rises when your budget rises and falls when it falls. Every recommendation it makes about your spending is also a recommendation about its own revenue.

That does not make anyone dishonest. It makes a particular kind of advice expensive to give. “Pause this campaign” is a pay cut. “Consolidate these nine ad groups into three” is a pay cut. “You could run this in-house for less” is a resignation letter. The advice that would help you most is precisely the advice the model punishes, and people follow their incentives long before they notice they are doing it.

There is a plainer objection too. A percentage charges you for the size of your budget rather than the amount of work. A £500,000 monthly account does not take ten times the effort of a £50,000 one — often it takes less, because the data is better and the decisions are clearer. You pay most for advice at exactly the point where poor advice costs you most.

We charge a fixed monthly fee, agreed before anything starts. Our income does not move when your spend moves, in either direction. That is not generosity, it is the mechanism: when we say cut this, we are not paid less for saying it, and when we say put three times the budget behind that product, we are not paid more. The aim was never to make you spend less — it is to make sure every pound is there because it earns its place. What you get is an opinion about your account rather than an opinion about our invoice.

Not sure which of these you need?

That is a reasonable position, and usually the right first conversation. Describe the symptom and we will work out where it is coming from.

Book a review